Should the US Build More Nuclear Power Plants?
The need to find new ways to produce energy is a very prevalent topic in the news today, with global warming a major concern as well. Because of that, fossil fuels are very unpopular, given their nonrenewable status and their contributions to pollution. Where can we turn for our power needs, though? Experts debate this problem often, with “green energy” also a hot topic of conversation these days. However, when most of us think of “green energy,” we usually think of energy sources that are renewable like solar, wind or geothermal energy.
However, nuclear energy is a renewable energy source as well, and it’s what many people don’t think of. One of the reasons for that is probably because the thought of nuclear energy makes people nervous. We have visions of nuclear accidents or catastrophe, such as those that happened at Chernobyl or Three Mile Island, but that’s not reality, for the most part. When it’s managed properly, nuclear power is very environmentally friendly, and can produce very clean power so that we can meet our energy needs with little trouble.
Today, the US has 104 commercial nuclear power plants in existence, and they provide about 20% of the electricity used in the US. By comparison, about 50% of our energy needs are provided by 614 coal plants. What’s unfortunate is that those 614 coal plants are significant contributors to global warming and pollution, with the constant release of debris and carbon dioxide into the atmosphere.
Besides the obvious drawbacks to burning coal, mining coal is also very detrimental to the environment. And that’s not to mention the direct human cost of using coal, in that burning coal and mining it significantly shortens lifespan for those exposed to it.
Benefits of nuclear energy versus other renewable energy sources – Solar and wind power, among others, are certainly good ways to generate electricity, too, but at present, they are not built into the infrastructure such that they are cost effective to use. While a growing number of people use solar panels on their roofs today, for example, only about 0.03% of the power in the US is generated by solar power. It will take a significant amount of time, money, and effort to make solar the energy producer nuclear could produce right now — and all without generating carbon emissions and other pollutants.
Although it does cause some pollution to construct nuclear power plants, once they’re constructed, nuclear power plants produce completely clean energy. This is needed so that we can meet our growing energy demands — which is going to be necessary even though all of us of course are focused on reducing our own personal energy consumption. It’s simply a matter of record that modern life needs energy, and the need for energy will continue to grow.
Consider, for example, that electric cars are among the popularly touted vehicles of the future that could produce completely clean, emission-free transportation — but only if that electricity is produced from clean sources itself, and not from fossil fuels-based sources. In other words, trying to provide electricity for electric cars by burning coal is really defeating the purpose.
By 2030, it’s expected that the US will need between 25 and 30 nuclear power plants to maintain the current 20% of energy needs that nuclear power plants provide. If we are to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, though, 187 power plants are going to need to be in existence by 2050. That means that nuclear power capacity is indeed going to need to be increased in the US so as to have no further negative impacts on the environment.
Author: Jerry Dyess has been managing companies in the Texas Energy business for the past 7 years. He has published many articles on Texas Power rates.